Posts tagged ‘bunker fuels’

Claudia Carpenter
Editor, Gulf commodities news

Insight Conversation: Cem Saral, CEO, Cockett Marine Oil

March 26, 2020 10:56 UTC

(0)

Cem Saral, CEO of bunker reseller Cockett Marine Oil, talked with Claudia Carpenter about how shipping has adapted to the International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0.5% limit on sulfur in marine fuel effective January 2020, and what comes next.

Cockett Marine Oil, owned by Swiss trader Vitol and South African holding company Grindrod, resold an estimated 5.5 million tons of marine fuel in 2019, versus 6.5 million tons in 2018. Saral was named Cockett CEO in September 2016, after working for Vitol and Chemoil. Cockett handles roughly 18,000 deliveries to customers annually in every single line of shipping. The company has about 185 employees, with about 60 of them in Dubai, the operating headquarters.

› Continue Reading

bunker fuels, Cockett Marine Oil, decarbonization, energy transition, IMO 2020, marine fuel, shipping

S&P Global Platts
News editors

Commodity Tracker: 5 charts to watch this week

November 25, 2019 05:43 UTC

(0)

(1)

In this week’s pick of energy and commodity charts, Asian jet fuel suppliers feel the pinch from Hong Kong’s weak demand as protests in the city persist. Plus: Fujairah stocks and IMO 2020, global gas exporters meet in Equatorial Guinea, and more.

› Continue Reading

bunker fuels, carbon, electricity, Fujairah, gas, GECF, jet fuel, oil

Jonty Rushforth
Senior director, price group

IMO 2020 and the Forties de-escalator in Dated Brent

September 9, 2019 03:30 UTC

(0)

The International Maritime Organization’s decision to cap the sulfur level of global marine fuels on January 1, 2020 has been the dominant story in the oil markets for the last two years.

Among the many questions raised by the imminent 0.5% cap on sulfur in marine fuels, some crude oil market participants are now asking what the implications could be for the Forties de-escalator, the key sulfur value adjustment mechanism that lies at the heart of the North Sea’s Brent crude complex.

› Continue Reading

Brent, bunker fuels, IMO 2020, North Sea

Sebastian Lewis
Content Director, China

IMO 2020: An opportunity for China’s bunker fuel sector?

July 29, 2019 09:14 UTC

(0)

(6)

China’s ports handle nearly a third of global container traffic and it has the largest merchant fleet in the world in terms of the number of ships owned.

But given the size of its fleet and the number of ships that pass through its ports, China plays a surprisingly small role in bonded bunkering – the provision of fuel sold tax-free to ships travelling between countries across international waters.

› Continue Reading

bunker fuels, China, IMO 2020, scrubbers, shipping, Singapore, sulfur cap

Jack Jordan
Editorial Lead, Bunker News

Shipping industry needs to look beyond IMO 2020 to lower-carbon fuels

July 24, 2019 12:21 UTC

(0)

(4)

As the International Maritime Organization enters a phase of curbing shipping industry emissions more robustly, the search is on for cleaner alternatives to high sulfur fuel oil to power marine freight worldwide.

The drop in the IMO’s global sulfur limit for shipping from next year is just the beginning, and is expected to drive the majority of shipowners into using new 0.5% sulfur fuel blends when it comes into force. Most have a plan in place to get past the immediate problem of reducing their sulfur emissions next year, but few have fully engaged with the IMO’s longer-term target of halving greenhouse gas output.

› Continue Reading

biofuels, bunker fuels, environment, IMO 2020, LNG, sustainability

S&P Global Platts
News editors

Commodity Tracker: 6 charts to watch this week

July 15, 2019 09:26 UTC

(0)

(2)

S&P Global Platts editors’ pick of unfolding commodities trends. This week, bunker values at Fujairah plunge, mine overcapacity puts pressure on key battery metal lithium, and US LNG exporters face tight margins over the summer. Plus Chinese refiners’ growing taste for Saudi crude, EU CO2 prices and gas and coal profitability.

› Continue Reading

bunker fuels, carbon emissions, EVs, gas, LNG, oil

Eleni Pittalis
Associate Editor

Could IMO 2020 sulfur cap be subject to law of unintended consequences?

September 12, 2018 06:00 UTC

(0)

(5)

The International Maritime Organization’s 2020 global 0.5% marine sulfur cap is an act of stewardship to protect the planet and human health for generations to come, but the supply and demand imbalances created by the cap encapsulate the law of unintended consequences.

The new sulfur cap is expected to displace around 3 million b/d of high sulfur fuel oil, according to S&P Global Platts Analytics. While the 2020 sulfur cap will endeavor to protect the marine environment and human health in an act of stewardship, the excess cheap high sulfur fuel oil sidelined from the bunker industry could prove attractive to nations trying to save on costs for power generation, such as Pakistan, Bangladesh and other East Asian countries.

› Continue Reading

bunker fuels, IMO, IMO 2020, shipping

Surabhi Sahu and Sambit Mohanty
Editors

Asia bunkering industry preparing for IMO 2020 sulfur deadline: Fuel for Thought

September 10, 2018 04:01 UTC

(0)

(4)

From Cosco in China to Posco in South Korea, Asian companies are pouring in millions of dollars to upgrade their shipping fleets as the International Maritime Organization’s deadline for cleaner bunker fuels inches closer.

With less than 16 months remaining, the global shipping industry is setting aside about $60 billion to obtain the right infrastructure in order to embrace cleaner shipping fuel.

› Continue Reading

bunker fuels, IMO 2020, marine fuels, shipping, sulfur cap

Platts Insight

Posts tagged ‘bunker fuels’

Categories

Recommended posts for you